Reviews > Car Reviews > Ford > Ford Ka (1996-09) Road Test

Reviews - Ford

Ford Ka (1996-09)

Overall Rating

4 stars

Ford got it Ka so right back in 1996 that the design remains virtually unchanged eight years on. It's cheap to buy and run, fun to drive and highly distinctive.

For
  • A characterful, high value used choice
  • Nimble handling, good ride, fun to drive
  • 40+ mpg, low insurance and service costs
Against
  • Rear accommodation is for two only
  • SportKa isn't worth the price premium
  • Not much equipment on basic 1.3 models
Road Test

Smaller than the Fiesta on which it's based, Ka packs comfort and clever design into a cabin that's roomy for two adults up front and snug for two kids in the back. Load space is restricted with the rear seat-backs up. Ka wins out in this class for ride and handling. It likes being driven spiritedly, thanks to agile responses, assured grip and accurate power steering. The elderly eight-valve 1.3 litre 60 bhp engine limits outright performance (it was uprated to 70 bhp in 2002) but keeps up with normal traffic and only gets harsh at higher revs. With used prices starting below 2000, insurance in Groups 2 or 3, 45 mpg, low service costs and good reliability, Ka appeals as a budget runabout or first car. Equipment is sparse on the basic Ka; Ka-2 and upwards come with central locking and electric windows; and Ka-3 has standard air con.

Need To Know

NCAP: 3 Stars

Best Models: Ka-2, Collection models, luxuryKa

Worst Models: Basic Ka without PAS

Replacement: 2008


Alternatives
Ford Ka (1996-09)
Star Ratings

Handling

4 stars

Comfort

4 stars

Quality & Reliability

4 stars

Performance

3 stars

Roominess

3 stars

Running Costs

4 stars

Value for Money

4 stars

Stereo/Sat Nav

2 stars
Related Links

Have you driven this car? Want to share your opinions? Write us a user review.